This is cross-cutting decommissioning/legal guidance rather than a physical-facility article. It states that demolition/sealing begins with a full inventory, identification and handling of contaminated areas and hazardous materials, assessment of groundwater effects if pumps are stopped, permitted waste transport/storage, restoration of surroundings and sealing—usually concrete infill—of every opening. Sealed facilities remain owned property, sometimes a separate 3D property, and may retain security restrictions. Long-unmaintained rock rooms may require rock scaling because of falling-block risk. No dimensions, counts, dates or costs for a particular facility are given.
← Back to archiveOriginal article · evidence audit and photographic archive
Avvecklade anläggningar
Vad är det som gäller?
The complete photographic sequence is presented in its original article context, alongside the facility dossiers drawn from the same source.
Civilförsvar · 26 May 2016 · 6 photographs
Original-article audit
What this source can support
Reviewed 15 August 2026 · geometry completeness 0/100 · high that no unit replacement model is supportable
status: no linked facility model | assessment: Correctly not treated as a facility. Its cost implications belong in separate demolition, remediation, reactivation or brownfield scenarios—not in greenfield functional-replacement totals unless the scope explicitly includes them.
other: All openings are normally sealed, most often by concrete infill, but no opening count or plug dimensions are stated.; Some underground installations remain separate three-dimensional properties after surface land is sold.
Pumping/dewatering is singled out because shutting it down may alter groundwater.; Inventory, hazardous-material removal, contaminated-area remediation and regulated waste logistics.; Concrete sealing of all openings and site restoration.; Rock-safety inspection/scaling before any re-entry or reuse.
Hazardous-material inventory and remediation.; Groundwater/hydrogeological investigation and pump decommissioning.; Waste transport and intermediate storage.; Portal/shaft plugging and landscape restoration.; Rock scaling and safety work for reactivation.
General decommissioning process. No facility, portfolio count or cost subject is defined.
Indeterminate
Defined facility and lifecycle scenario.; Opening count and plug geometry.; Hazardous-material and contamination survey.; Groundwater inflow/pump duty and hydrogeology.; Rock-condition survey.; Waste quantities, haul routes and disposal classes.
The article is useful scope-boundary evidence, not morphology/quantity evidence.; The statement that restoration after trespass can be 'very expensive' is qualitative and not a cost amount.; Do not add remediation of an existing site to a new-build replacement estimate by default.
Source photography
Photographs from Avvecklade anläggningar
6 photographs sourced from the original article, with captions where available.
We do not claim ownership of source photographs.