This is a cancelled 1947 ammunition-cavern proposal, not a built fortification. It supports a planned 5,000 m² / 53,820 ft² land take, an approximately 200 m long and 3 m wide access-road loop, one angled entrance tunnel and a camouflaged timber loading shed with a drive-through truck arrangement. No cavern size or cost is given, and the municipal land request was rejected.
← Back to archiveOriginal article · evidence audit and photographic archive
Berget som aldrig sprängdes
Göteborgs förrådsberg
The complete photographic sequence is presented in its original article context, alongside the facility dossiers drawn from the same source.
Militärt · 19 November 2015 · 4 photographs
Original-article audit
What this source can support
Reviewed 15 August 2026 · geometry completeness 25/100 · High that it was unbuilt; very low for cost
No linked replacement-cost dossier exists, which is correct. The article is useful for planning and access-cost evidence but cannot support a replacement value or an asset count.
published: 5,000 m² / 53,820 ft² planned site area; approximately 200 m access road; 3 m road width; one angled entrance tunnel; camouflaged timber loading shed with loading dock and truck doors | not_published: cavern dimensions; rock volume; tunnel length and section; magazine layout; blast and ammunition-safety separation
camouflage/loading shed; ammunition loading interface
cavern and magazine geometry; access road and mass haul; blast separation; loading shed and truck interface; ammunition safety systems
One cancelled concept; no physical facility was constructed at the described site.
Label the source prominently as unbuilt/cancelled; exclude it from the 76-facility inventory and all replacement rankings; if retained, place it in a separate planned-projects collection; use the access-road evidence only as a historical design note, not as a quantity for another anonymous asset
approved final plans; cavern and magazine quantities; tender or budget; built-status evidence if any contrary claim is made
source-article counts can be mistaken for built-facility counts; an unbuilt concept needs a distinct status badge; identity inference would be unsafe
Source photography
Photographs from Berget som aldrig sprängdes
4 photographs sourced from the original article, with captions where available.
We do not claim ownership of source photographs.