This is a class-level technical description and strongly supports morphology discipline. It distinguishes rock command centres from buried concrete D1 00-type facilities and lists the common protection and autonomy systems: blast/gas barriers, gas locks, fast valves, overpressure, aerosol/carbon filters, cooling/dehumidification, sealed penetrations, generator and fuel autonomy, EMP protection, emergency lighting, water tanks/deep wells, sewage pumps and dedicated drainage pits/pumps. It supplies no asset geometry, quantities or costs.
← Back to archiveOriginal article · evidence audit
Civilförsvarets ledningscentraler
The article-level geometry, cost and systems audit is preserved here even though no source photographs are available in the archive.
18 September 2014 · 0 photographs
Original-article audit
What this source can support
Reviewed 15 August 2026 · geometry completeness 0/100 · High as class context; not applicable to asset cost
No linked dossier is correct, but this source should inform the replacement-cost methodology. It directly supports splitting morphology, water/drainage, protected products and autonomy rather than using one generic area-based protection package.
published: rock and buried-concrete branches are distinct; buried-concrete emergency egress via shaft is a class feature | not_published: asset-specific dimensions and all quantities
blast barriers and gas locks; fast-closing ventilation valves; overpressure and aerosol/carbon filtration; cooling/dehumidification; protected penetrations; standby generation and fuel; EMP surge protection and shielded room; emergency lighting; mains/deep-well water and storage; sewage and drainage pump pits
morphology-specific civil shell; blast/CBRN products; power/fuel autonomy; cooling/dehumidification; water and drainage; protected penetrations and commissioning
General design class; no physical facility or programme count.
Cite it on a dedicated replacement-cost methodology page; turn the systems list into a checklist with asset-level present/absent/unknown fields; separate rock and buried-concrete branches; add explicit drainage/water and protected-penetration lines; do not present historical threat ratings as modern warranted performance
asset-specific system schedules; current code/protection brief; supplier budgets; commissioning requirements
valuable methodology evidence is not visibly linked to dossier system completeness; current lumped protection packages underuse this source; historical performance language needs a modern-code disclaimer