The fixed works were dispersed surface deployment sites for a mobile Bloodhound system, not bunkers. Exercise/peacetime sites used octagonal launch pads and wartime sites square pads, plus hardened areas for the missile-group control centre, illumination radar and motor generators and two mast foundations. There were 33 secret deployment sites nationally; F17 had six, including one exercise site. A company fielded four launchers, eight missiles, two generators and 11 km of cable, with about 138–140 personnel. No pad dimensions, paved area, road length or concrete thickness is given.

inner_structure: Surface civil works: octagonal or square reinforced-concrete launch pads, separate equipment hardstands, two mast foundations and an access road; explicitly no fixed shelter or defensive works at exercise and wartime deployment sites. | other: value: 33 | unit: deployment sites | scope: national programme including exercise sites; value: 6 | unit: deployment sites | scope: F17's two three-site groupings; value: 4 | unit: launch pads/launchers per company | scope: standard RB 68 company; value: 2 | unit: mast foundations | scope: the described exercise site

amount_sek: 40000 | price_date: 1967–1968 | basis: one-time payment for a 30-year land lease | scope: one F17 exercise site | note: Article gives SEK 360,000 as a 2017 purchasing-power equivalent; this is land tenure, not construction.; amount_sek: 400000000 | price_date: 1960s programme | basis: UK delivery budget | scope: six-division RB 68 acquisition programme | note: Included missiles, launchers and other imported materiel; not fortification cost.; amount_sek: 400000000 | price_date: 1960s programme | basis: Swedish delivery/support budget | scope: whole RB 68 programme | note: Included vehicles, radio link, fortifications and about 30 years of maintenance at roughly SEK 1m/year; civil works are not separated.; amount_sek: 1000000000 | price_date: 1965 price level | basis: estimated total life-cycle cost | scope: whole RB 68 programme | note: Article gives about SEK 11bn in 2017 purchasing power; not a site replacement cost.

system: mission equipment | evidence: Per company: radio link, missile-group control centre/computer, illumination radar, four launchers, eight missiles, two motor generators, power distribution, 11 km cable, vehicles and test equipment. | scope: one RB 68 company; system: communications | evidence: Bidirectional voice/data radio link to an LFC; the exercise site also had a telecom cabinet for LFC or ordinary telephone-cable connection. | scope: company and exercise-site evidence; system: power | evidence: Two motor-generator sets and a power-distribution unit per company; fixed hardstanding was prepared for generator placement. | scope: one company/site; system: autonomy and support | evidence: Mobile field company carried cooking, fresh water, food, ammunition, accommodation and medical support; these were not permanent site buildings. | scope: mobile company; system: protection | evidence: No fixed shelter or permanent close-defence works were built, deliberately avoiding signatures; protection relied on concealment, terrain and movement. | scope: exercise and wartime deployment sites

number, plan dimensions, thickness and reinforcement of launch pads; radar/control/generator hardstand areas; access-road length and pavement; mast foundations and telecom connection; site count and reuse/commonality across companies; if functional replacement includes it: radar, control computers, launchers, generators, vehicles, missiles and 11 km cable per company

The article combines one F17 exercise-site narrative, F17's six-site grouping, 33 national deployment sites, 12 wartime companies and the entire weapon-system acquisition. The programme budgets cannot be divided into a per-site civil cost from this source.

Indeterminate

launch-pad plan dimensions, thickness and reinforcement; equipment-hardstand areas and pavement build-up; access-road lengths and standards; utility and telecom trench lengths; site earthworks and drainage; site inventory by exercise, peacetime and wartime type; civil-works share of the Swedish SEK 400m programme budget; chosen replacement scope for mission equipment

No dossier is linked despite substantial fixed-civil and programme-cost evidence.; Programme life-cycle budgets include equipment, vehicles, fortification and maintenance and must not be treated as site construction totals.; The SEK 40,000 figure is a 30-year lease payment, not a build cost.; The absence of shelters is positive morphology evidence; a bunker archetype would be wrong.