BunkerStrategyIntelligence terminal
← Back to archiveOriginal article · evidence audit

Sandsilos

The article-level geometry, cost and systems audit is preserved here even though no source photographs are available in the archive.

5 June 2015 · 0 photographs

Original-article audit

What this source can support

Reviewed 15 August 2026 · geometry completeness 10/100 · Very low

The site commendably labels its dossier Representative Unit and avoids a national multiplier, but the SEK 74.3m base rests on an assumed 700 m² / 7,535 ft² and 4,900 m³. The wide SEK 14.3m-398.0m range demonstrates that the article cannot price a unit. It should not be in the facility ranking.

Supported use

This short article describes a class of rock road-sand silos: a summit fill/drop opening and a truck tunnel descending to the draw point, sometimes with a bend that avoids reversing. It provides no named unit, count, size, shaft depth, tunnel length, systems or cost, and does not substantiate alleged Cold War secondary uses.

Geometry evidence

published: summit drop/fill shaft; truck tunnel to draw point; optional turning/bent tunnel arrangement | not_published: named unit; count; chamber volume; shaft dimensions; tunnel length/cross-section; turning geometry

Systems described

passive sand storage and gravity loading concept

Primary cost drivers

silo/chamber capacity; shaft depth and diameter; truck-tunnel length and section; turnaround configuration; rock support and drainage; loading equipment

Unit / programme scope

A class description only; no physical unit or national count is supported.

Revision direction

Retain only as an interactive archetype/reference class; remove the single base total from the master ranking; model capacity, shaft and tunnel geometry when a named unit is documented; state that the secondary-use claim is unverified

Missing inputs

named site and count; capacity; shaft depth/diameter; tunnel length/section; rock and water conditions; loading equipment

Site / data issues

class article is displayed in an asset archive; assumed representative unit looks like a physical estimate; enormous range is not decision-grade

Linked records

Facilities covered by this article

1 dossier connect the article to distinct facilities or facility groups.