BunkerStrategyIntelligence terminal
← Back to archiveOriginal article · evidence audit and photographic archive

Den framskjutna enheten

Fortifikatoriskt skydd för räddningstjänstens insatsstyrka

The complete photographic sequence is presented in its original article context, alongside the facility dossiers drawn from the same source.

Civilförsvar · 26 June 2015 · 9 photographs

Original-article audit

What this source can support

Reviewed 15 August 2026 · geometry completeness 8/100 · Very low

The current model correctly excludes a vehicle shelter, but its 80/140/220 m² / 861 / 1,507 / 2,368 ft² scenarios and SEK 30.0m base are pure class proxies. This is not an asset-specific cost estimate and should not rank beside quantity-supported facilities.

Supported use

The article supports one preserved 1970s forward rescue-unit personnel shelter and explicitly says this example had no vehicle shelter. The discussion of five personnel out of a 20-person fire service is illustrative, not a stated design capacity. No area, shell, entry, systems or cost is given.

Geometry evidence

published: one personnel-only shelter; 1970s construction period | not_published: area; capacity; concrete thickness and quantity; burial depth; entry/escape; ventilation and power

Systems described

personnel shelter function; vehicles remained outside for the focal unit

Primary cost drivers

capacity and floor area; buried shell; entry/escape; protected ventilation; utility autonomy

Unit / programme scope

One anonymous focal unit; the article also describes the FE concept generally.

Revision direction

Reclassify as a representative archetype rather than a priced physical asset; suppress the single base value; retain personnel-only scope; rebuild the model from capacity, plan and shell thickness once source drawings are found

Missing inputs

as-built plan/section; design capacity; shell and reinforcement; entry/escape; ventilation/power/water schedule; historic tender or final account

Site / data issues

asset-specific title with class-proxy quantities; hypothetical staffing could be misread as evidence; ranking precision is not warranted

Linked records

Facilities covered by this article

1 dossier connect the article to distinct facilities or facility groups.

Source photography

9 photographs sourced from the original article, with captions where available.

We do not claim ownership of source photographs.
Original article ↗Request a credit correction or removal →